Skip to main content

Reread somewhat juvenile Dinosaur Beach, which I enjoyed as a kid/teen

I was wowed by Keith Laumer's Dinosaur Beach in my early teens, and have been curious whether I would still enjoy it as a much more advanced-in-years adult. It was definitely a mixed bag, but I'm glad I reread it both because I did enjoy aspects of it, and it is pretty interesting to see what held up to more informed attention, and to identify it. (Hence this blog entry... (-: )

Some of what I say below might constitute spoilers. But I think what I reveal is in such general terms that I think they might make up for the surprise of their presence with curiosity about how the delivery of the revealed items were implemented. None the less, still spoilers.

My reservations with this book are of the sort that pulp novels generally suffer - shallowness in characterization and connection, and particularly endemic to science fiction, shallowness in the science.

I think the latter - specifically, shallowness in time travel theorizing - was not contrary to Laumer's purpose and style. I do not think he was or intended to be serious about time travel theorizing. Rather, that theorizing was more of a playful game, one that provided a backdrop for the thing that I think was so compelling for me as a young reader, and one of the main things I actually enjoyed while rereading it now: intricate layering of "wheels within wheels" plotting that I feel is inventive and intriguing. To a degree.

So here's two things I can identify that I enjoyed:
  1. Laumer actually achieved surprising twists in what could have been monotonous layering of forces at work. In particular in the denouement, the agents of the deepest layer did something that the other layers did not, in a way that was foreshadowed but still evocative and thought-provoking.
  2. Some of the extremely isolated and distinctive scenes – like various ends of time including Dinosaur Beach or successively more remote futures, or disconnected time pockets – had some visceral and poetic substantiality. (Like another obscure but evocative and favorite old sci-fi read, Gordon R. Dickenson's Sleepwalker's World, much of the action happens in isolated twilight of one sort or another, and I find a kind of appealing quiet in the read, even though in these books it's often intended to be ominous or just full of outright duress...)
In its perfunctory characterization and silly theorizing I would say this book qualifies well as pulp science fiction. That I found the plot layers intriguing puts it well ahead of much of the other pulp. 

That said, there are many other favorites that I would recommend well ahead of this one. I recently mentioned my reread of Frank Herbert's The Dosadi Experiment, and I think that's an excellent book, yet maybe for a particular taste, not a general introduction. I'm considering rereading another old favorite, John Brunner's Stand on Zanzibar. I'm very curious to see how that stands up. Like Dosadi, I've reread that at various points (though not as many times as the former), and I've enjoyed it. It played with "new-wave" fragmented and provocatively disorienting storytelling in ways that were new to sci-fi (though not to contemporary fiction), and which were worth my while in how things tied together. I look forward to it...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Contemplative Movement Online Score

Barbara Dilley developed a shared dance/meditation practice called Contemplative Dance Practice – CDP, a "dancer's meditation hall". I've been exploring adaptation of this score for online sharing. The aim is to share meditation and movement across the gap of social distancing. (See below the score description for online meeting logistics and further info about the practices.)

(The framing of this score is a work in progress, continuing to change. Revision information is at the bottom.)
Score DescriptionThe score is divided into sections. At the beginning of each timed section the facilitator says which section it is and arranges for a bell to sound at the beginning and the end of that section. Opening Circle: Time for brief introductions / check-ins and to review the outline of the score (essentially, the bold headers below).Meditation: 15 minutes for stillness. In the original score the participants share sitting meditation. We invite whatever meditation method works …

Finding inspiration in solo movement through exploration of changing balance

Contact Improvisation offers extraordinary opportunities to explore movement cooperation with others and oneself. I've been investigating a question about how to find the inspiration that can come from dancing with others in solo moving. I had been exploring a practice for a long time before the COVID pandemic. Having to concentrate on solo moving during the pandemic has given me the opportunity to resolve some questions about how to describe the practice and its purpose, enough so that I feel ready to describe it.It's based in the small dance that Steve Paxton associates with the stand, also informed by Nancy Stark Smith's finger dance.The Basic ScoreAfter stretching a little I standTime happens. I gradually notice more about what's happening in my body.Eventually I notice some small movements – shifts of weight, displacement from breathing, and needing to adjust my position; everything counts.Eventually I might notice very slow shifting – gradual tendencies in a dire…

How and why multiple dispatch is good (Julia vs Python)

I'm really interested in the programming language, Julia, for several reasons, multiple dispatch being prominent among them. (I have some painful contortions in the Python implementation of my speculative programming project, Spherical. The contortions would not be necessary if Python was implemented with efficient multiple dispatch.) I thinkthis videogets at the essence of multiple dispatch's virtue.
Unfortunately it's a video, who has time for that? The distilled message is that the multiple dispatch (multimethods) solvesThe Expression Problem, and that's not a small thing. It's an oblique way of saying that it's a more comprehensive way to do procedural composition than other approaches, and so fundamentally has greater potential for comprehensibility. Composition is the essence of building stuff, and comprehensibility is the factor that governs collaboration between people - including, for that matter, of a person with themself over time.
I love Python, bu…